Subscribe to CleanTechnica’s daily news updates via email, or follow us on Google News!
Moss Landing Fire: A Setback for Battery Storage in California
As California grapples with devastating wildfires devastating parts of Los Angeles, another alarming incident has unfolded at the Moss Landing battery storage facility, situated between Santa Cruz and Monterey. This facility’s fire signals a significant hurdle for battery energy storage systems (BESS) in the state. The site, which previously housed a methane-powered thermal generating station that has been operational since the Truman administration, now hosts multiple BESS installations.
A Quick Overview of Moss Landing’s Battery Storage Capacity
The first phase of this auxiliary storage project launched in 2020 with a capacity of 300 MW delivering 1,200 MWh. This was succeeded by an additional phase in 2021 adding another 100 MW and 400 MWh. Most recently, August 2023 saw the completion of Phase 3 — a monumental addition that boosted capacity to an impressive total of 750 MW and storing up to 3,000 MWh across all phases. Managed by Vistra Energy, implementing this BESS at a former power generation site allowed for the efficient use of existing electrical infrastructure while minimizing potential zoning complications.
Details Surrounding the Recent Incident
Credit: LG Energy Solution
On January 16, 2024, reports from Lookout Santa Cruz indicated that Phase One at Vistra’s battery storage site ignited into flames; intense smoke ascended over a thousand feet high into the atmosphere as waves of anxiety rippled through California’s BESS landscape. Meanwhile, health authorities later retracted components of their advisory to local residents after determining there was “no imminent significant threat” linked to ongoing firefighting efforts.
“The fire is mostly under control,” North Monterey County Fire Chief Joel Mendoza stated during updates provided via media sessions. He rated its ferocity at “around one percent,” attributing minimal impact thanks to prompt actions taken by emergency services and preliminary assessments from both Vistra and environmental agencies indicating no harmful hydrogen fluoride emissions were detected—gas typically associated with lithium-ion fires. Thankfully reports confirmed no injuries among nearby civilians or personnel involved in operations.
Response from Officials and Local Leaders
The response from governmental officials occurred promptly as well; State Senator John Laird remarked on how tragic it is that efforts towards safety conflict with ambitions for reducing fossil fuel reliance: “This situation highlights critical discrepancies we need addressing.” Following suit were leaders across Central Coast regions expressing collective disappointment while emphasizing accountability within emerging technologies meant to aid environmental preservation rather than compromise air quality.
“It’s essential we expect far better performance from Vistra Corp., given this recent outcome,” Assemblymember Dawn Addis emphasized following her district’s interests stretching alongside coastal areas up through Live Oak towards San Luis Obispo before venturing further northward past Santa Cruz.” She continued insisting commitments ensuring non-recurrence incidents must be foremost priorities: “We entered these discussions believing such facilities operated securely; clear evidence suggests there remains substantial work yet ahead.”
“
A Turning Point for Renewable Energy Initiatives?
The concerns echoed by Monterey County Supervisor Glenn Church underscored broader implications reflecting upon renewable ambitions amidst public risk apprehension arising specifically those dealing explicitly with energy sources reliant upon lithium-ion technologies’ failures.”Church likened proceedings here akin backing misjudged risks linked qualitatively dangerous events taking note drawing comparisons historically relevant toward ‘Three Mile Island’ reactor failure—signifying critical investigations imperative moving forth insuring safer prospects surrounding green initiatives must emerge paramount.””
Future Implications on Battery Storage Projects Nearby
This incident challenged broader contexts beyond just Californian media landscapes since it came shortly after local approvals being weighed against Mr Fairfield apply under authorizing conditions versus newly proposed $200 million development plan eyeing construction around Watsonville pertinent similar battery technology parameters sought trending metrics.“Seeking maximized scrutiny remains inevitable throughout discussion evaluation process concerning prospective projects due rooted skepticism now affecting developer confidence,” noted District Supervisor Cummings openly when pressed following reported occurrences.’Supervisors agreed outward perception might heighten hesitation community resource funding wants evaluating move suggestions tied substantive infrastructural deviations post-Moss incidents valid concerns borne out recently pressing limits could yield further obstacles negotiating new developments comprehensively moving forward.’ “
‘>
