Creator? Gamer? CreAmer. Using a barely modified design, new connections and new {hardware} grounded in an Intel Gen 13 and a Nvidia RTX 4070, the Aero 16 OLED seeks to win over gamers and creators alike. We put the laptop by its paces to search out out what the case change and {hardware} upgrades carry to the desk.
Gigabyte’s Aero 16 OLED is an attention-grabbing mixture of gaming laptop and workstation for creatives. In addition to the change from Alder to Raptor Lake CPU and from Nvidia RTX 30x to RTX 40x, different modifications have additionally been made, akin to to the case and the ports.
We’ve beforehand reviewed the predecessor with the RTX 3080 Ti and our present configuration has an RTX 4070. So far we have solely reviewed the brand new Razer Blade 18 with the identical GPU, so the 18-incher should function comparability within the 3D benchmarks. Otherwise we examine earlier era 16-inch opponents, together with the Asus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 and the MSI CreatorPro Z16P with its Nvidia A300.
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 – 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 61 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Memory
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, shiny: sure, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH – cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: microSD card reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
peak x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 354 x 255 ( = 0.71 x 13.94 x 10.04 in)
Battery
88 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FullHD IR Webcam for WIndows Hello
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional options
Speakers: stereo audio system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: sure
Weight
2.1 kg ( = 74.08 oz / 4.63 kilos), Power Supply: 705 g ( = 24.87 oz / 1.55 kilos)
Note: The producer could use parts from totally different suppliers together with show panels, drives or reminiscence sticks with comparable specs.
At first look, the design seems to be unchanged, however in case you take a more in-depth look, you may see that the slim, silver steel chassis has modified fairly a bit. For instance, it has turn into even thinner and Gigabyte has lastly shifted a number of the ports to the again. Overall, the producer’s design is extra within the path of a enterprise and workplace laptop than a gaming laptop, which will definitely please the goal group. So the hidden gamer appears fairly inconspicuous in an workplace setting, even alongside a MacBook.
The easy steel unibody continues to be secure, particularly on the base, which may hardly be twisted. The keyboard has been lowered barely.
The show lid, on which the illuminated “Aero” brand is emblazoned, is considerably much less inflexible. Only the show body is product of plastic.
Ventilation grilles are virtually in all places, specifically on the again, on the edges, under and above. The construct high quality appears to be on an excellent degree and no gaps have been discovered.
{aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_335676’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#presentDeviceSize_335449’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_335449’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#presentDeviceSize_328255’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_328255’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#presentDeviceSize_333487’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_333487’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#presentDeviceSize_333558’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_333558’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#presentDeviceSize_335542’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘presentDeviceSizelabel_335542’).checked = false;return false;” title=”disguise all”>❌
Quite a bit has modified within the ports, fortuitously, as a result of the meager three USB-C ports of the predecessor needed to be expanded with an Aero Hub to incorporate HDMI, USB-A, and many others.
This 12 months, the brand new Aero homes nearly all the required ports. To do that, it makes use of the area on the again the place the mains connection is, for instance. We would have most well-liked a USB-A as a substitute of one of many three USB-C ports on the aspect, and a LAN port continues to be lacking, however not less than there’s now an HDMI port and a (microSD) reader. The port distribution is nice, besides for USB-A on the again as a substitute of on the aspect.
MicroSD playing cards click on into place and protrude solely minimally (1 – 2 mm).
The switch charges are good; we copied 1 GB of picture materials from our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 to the desktop in about 7 seconds.
If opponents have a reader in any respect, it’s slower.
The Intel AX210 chip was additionally put in in final 12 months’s mannequin and once more ensures good switch charges, although the MSI CreatorPro is even sooner.
The module helps Wifi 6E and thus the 6 GHz vary.
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (886 – 1857, n=31, final 2 years) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (885 – 1827, n=6) |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (685 – 1890, n=65, final 2 years) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (1030 – 1318, n=2) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (980 – 1875, n=29, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 |
|
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (1198 – 1444, n=5) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (740 – 1780, n=58, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 |
|
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (1320 – 1333, n=2) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 |
|
Gigabyte has lastly put in a Full HD digital camera into the inventive laptop, with the ensuing picture being fairly usable, even in suboptimal lighting situations. A take a look at the ColorChecker, nevertheless, sadly exhibits that the colours deviate drastically. The predecessor had a 720p digital camera.
18 ∆E
23 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
The Aero is just not actually for safety fanatics. TPM is on board, however there isn’t any fingerprint sensor or Kensington connection.
No equipment are included along with the laptop upon buy.
In Germany, the producer supplies a 24-month guarantee. This could differ in different areas, so patrons ought to double-examine earlier than buy.
First, 10 torx screws have to be eliminated. Afterwards, discovering a niche within the tight chassis for inserting degree instruments is just not really easy. The greatest approach to do that is in direction of the again. Once step one has been made, it turns into a lot simpler and the baseplate could be indifferent fairly effortlessly.
Inside, you will have entry to the followers, the battery, the replaceable WLAN module, the 2 RAM slots and the 2 M.2 SSD slots, considered one of which is occupied. There are cooling pads on the bottom plate for the 2 SSD slots.
The keyboard now has white as a substitute of black keys. This appears extra elegant, however you must chorus from activating the white keyboard backlight in vivid lighting, in any other case you will not have the ability to discern the lettering – however who does?
The structure appears very tidy. None of the keys seem misplaced, and even the arrow keys are of regular dimension – superb. Keys are of medium dimension and are all properly spaced aside.
Key journey is round 1.7 mm and the suggestions simply barely perceptible. Typing is fast and the noise average, however the area bar is just a little louder.
Although the on/off change is built-in into the highest proper of the keyboard, it has a a lot firmer strain level and is just a little smaller in order that it’s not really easy to press by chance. In Gigabyte laptops, the particular keys for brightness (additional left right here) and quantity (additional proper right here) are normally swapped, which takes some getting used to.
The touchpad stays the identical dimension as its predecessor (approx. 12.1 x 7.6 cm), however is now silver as a substitute of black and gives good gliding properties, even with very sluggish actions.
The built-in keys present clear suggestions and are thus barely louder than the keyboard keys, however nonetheless average.
Gigabyte once more installs a 16-inch OLED panel from Samsung with a 16:10 facet ratio and a 4K decision of three,840 x 2,400. The panel has a brand new model quantity, however nonetheless solely gives 60 Hz – a draw back for gamers. Otherwise the OLED panel boasts a wealthy distinction, an excellent black degree and superb illumination. The IPS competitors can not sustain right here.
We measured a brightness of just below 400 nits in SDR show mode. But the panel additionally meets the HDR600 normal. So we measured in HDR mode and arrived at a peak brightness of 620 nits. This is just doable with a small measuring discipline, since OLEDs rapidly darken on massive, vivid areas.
Screen bleeding is just not a problem with OLEDs. Response occasions are additionally wonderful.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 402.15 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 395 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 387.56 cd/m²
Contrast: 12999:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.23 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
96.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560×1600, 18.00 | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung SDC415D, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920×1200, 16.00 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 96.9 -3% | 99.84 0% | 69.4 -31% | 97.6 -2% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 99.99 0% | 97.8 -2% | 99.9 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.4 | 85.3 -12% | 88.9 -8% | 70.9 -26% | 87.4 -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1, 1) | 2.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.2, 1.2) -20% | 4.2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2.1, 2.1) -110% | 2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1, 1) -0% | 17 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(8, 9) -750% | 12.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6.2, 6.6) -540% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.98 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.5, 1.48) | 2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1, 1) -1% | 8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.8, 4.2) -304% | 2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1, 1) -1% | 10.1 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(5.4, 4.7) -410% | 7.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.4, 4) -274% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 60 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(58) 0% | 59 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(80) -2% | |||
| Brightness center | 389.97 | 368 -6% | 549.6 41% | 346 -11% | 308 -21% | 407 4% |
| Brightness | 395 | 368 -7% | 524 33% | 354 -10% | 293 -26% | 388 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 89 -8% | 96 -1% | 90 -7% | 88 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.01 67% | 0.53 -1667% | 0.23 -667% | 0.36 -1100% | |
| Contrast | 12999 | 36800 183% | 1037 -92% | 1339 -90% | 1131 -91% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.33 -17% | 3.32 -66% | 2.28 -14% | 1.47 26% | 1.3 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 4.34 -6% | 6.63 -62% | 4.94 -20% | 2.98 27% | 2.5 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.68 | 2.7 -61% | 2.16 -29% | 1.02 39% | 0.7 58% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.23 | 0.8 64% | 2 10% | 1.64 26% | 2.2 1% | 2.1 6% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.119 104% | 2.29 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.228 99% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6323 103% | 6569 99% | 6319 103% | 6384 102% | 6228 104% | 6437 101% |
* … smaller is best
Gigabyte advertises the Aero 16 as offering one hundred pc DCI-P3 protection and our measurements verify this declare. Even AdobeRGB is roofed at 96.4 p.c. The OLED show is thus very appropriate for enhancing images and movies.
The show is already properly calibrated ex works; our calibration by way of Portrait Displays Calman Color Calibration pushes the DeltaE values down barely much more. So the show has solely very slight coloration and grayscale deviations. Our ICC profile could be downloaded above.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response occasions present how briskly the display screen is ready to change from one coloration to the subsequent. Slow response occasions can result in afterimages and may cause shifting objects to seem blurry (ghosting). Gamers of quick-paced 3D titles ought to pay particular consideration to quick response occasions.
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the display screen, some notebooks will merely cycle the backlight on and off in speedy succession – a technique referred to as Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This biking frequency ought to ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If mentioned frequency is just too low, customers with delicate eyes could expertise pressure or complications and even discover the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz |  | |
The show backlight sparkles at 60 Hz (Likely using PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz could be very low, so the flickering could trigger eyestrain and complications after prolonged use. In comparability: 53 % of all examined units don’t use PWM to dim the show. If PWM was detected, a mean of 19343 (minimal: 5 – most: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
As is typical for OLEDs, the show sparkles at 60 Hz at full brightness. At round 50 p.c brightness and under, the frequency modifications, and 238 Hz could show annoying for delicate folks.
Outdoors, after all, the reflective floor is distracting. The somewhat common SDR brightness and the nice contrasts can solely steadiness out this drawback to a restricted extent. A shady spot and a direct viewing angle are really useful.
A loss in brightness solely turns into noticeable when trying on the show from excessive angles.
The Aero homes model-new {hardware}. The mixture of i9-13900H, RTX 4070 and 32 GB DDR5-4800 shouldn’t pose any issues for customers, whether or not gaming or utilizing inventive purposes.
However, all this {hardware} is packed right into a slim case, so it doesn’t run at full energy, as will probably be proven under. After all, a inventive laptop is just not imagined to be a brilliant-scorching roaring laptop, so hardcore gamers should undergo just a little right here.
Our take a look at gadget did not have a Control Center preinstalled, so there have been no efficiency modes to start with. The energy modes preinstalled in Windows by Gigabyte had nearly no affect on CPU efficiency in Cinebench R15.
Therefore, and as a result of the followers by no means stood nonetheless at first, we put in the Gigabyte Control Center afterwards. Here we have been confronted with the troublesome alternative of the efficiency mode: there are a complete of 5 right here, and we had a tough time selecting between Content Creator and Gaming. So we needed to determine between good efficiency however louder followers, or quieter operation with weaker efficiency.
In the tip, we carried out the CPU benchmarks with out the Control Center, i.e. within the supply state. The GPU benchmarks then run in gaming mode.
The software program is not at all times totally freed from errors. For instance, it simply displayed a black window throughout some begins. Also complicated is that, along with the modes, there’s one other choice window “Power Mode” with additional choices for energy management. These seemingly signify the vitality modes, as a result of in case you set this to Custom, the Windows energy modes could be chosen.
There can be an “AI” change on the left of the primary modes. The “AI” independently selects the very best mode relying on the state of affairs, for instance, the vitality-saving mode after we disconnect the ability plug.
At the center of the Aero is an Intel Core i9-13900H, one of many flagships of Intel’s model new Raptor Lake collection. This supplies 6 efficiency and 8 effectivity cores, with the previous clocking at as much as 5.4 GHz in turbo! Alternatively, the gadget can be obtainable with an i7-13700H.
In our Cinebench R15 loop, the Aero comes out on prime, however the benefit over the i9-12900H from the Alder Lake collection is marginal and the predecessor is hardly slower throughout all CPU exams.
A take a look at the ability consumption exhibits that you must undoubtedly set up the Control Center. Because in supply state, the CPU solely treats itself to 70 W for a short while earlier than falling to 45 W. On the opposite hand, in case you change to Gaming Mode within the Control Center, the quick-time period TDP will increase to 115 W, and then hangs at round 60 W for the remainder of a Cinebench run. So it very a lot is dependent upon the ability settings.
Without Gaming mode, the brand new Aero 16 isn’t any sooner than its predecessor throughout all CPU benchmarks.
The CPU can solely draw on round 20 W in battery mode and the Cinebench rating is correspondingly decrease.
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2963 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
219 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
243 Points
Help
In PCMark 10, our Aero exchanges blows with final 12 months’s MSI CreatorPro Z16P. Unfortunately, the Aero has a weak productiveness rating, nevertheless it does very properly within the different sub-exams.
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (4477 – 9151, n=188, final 2 years) |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (7334 – 12639, n=187, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (6161 – 11833, n=187, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (5288 – 16424, n=187, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (974 – 2195, n=92, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (907 – 2062, n=92, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (1027 – 2514, n=92, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (1029 – 2230, n=92, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| PCMark 10 Score | 8058 factors | |
Help | ||
Shortly after beginning LatencyMon, the software program detects the primary DPC latencies. These improve additional when launching the browser and opening a number of tabs. Our 4K/60 fps YouTube video, however, is rendered easily and with out skipped frames.
The Razer Blade 18 has even worse latency values than our Aero.
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
* … smaller is best
The producer makes use of a really quick PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD from its personal firm. It is presently ranked second in our greatest record.
The mannequin right here does not fairly attain its greatest efficiency, particularly for the reason that Phison reminiscence within the predecessor (rank 1) is a tad sooner.
At least efficiency is comparatively fixed, and it is good {that a} cooling pad is connected to the bottom plate.
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7051 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4407 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
827 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
757 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
73.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
213 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
724 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1626 MB/s
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2519 – 4117, n=5) |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (834 – 5676, n=186, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2200 – 4236, n=5) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (399 – 7889, n=185, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (6921 – 7034, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (1620 – 13195, n=186, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3611 – 4926, n=5) |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (86.2 – 10261, n=186, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (66.9 – 88.8, n=5) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (23.3 – 97.4, n=186, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (313 – 391, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (66.6 – 421, n=185, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3523 – 3582, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (310 – 5829, n=185, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3570 – 3604, n=5) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (288 – 4383, n=185, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (5636 – 9279, n=5) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (910 – 10330, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (1805 – 3629, n=5) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (389 – 3629, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3012 – 3996, n=5) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (338 – 5157, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (4541 – 5715, n=5) |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (925 – 9971, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2310 – 3806, n=5) |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (308 – 8590, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (61.3 – 108, n=5) |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (20 – 108, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (256 – 325, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (18 – 364, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (1285 – 2963, n=5) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (216 – 2963, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2493 – 3371, n=5) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (243 – 4381, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (0.041 – 0.094, n=5) |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (0.022 – 0.23, n=168, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (0.012 – 0.425, n=173, final 2 years) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024 |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 |
|
| Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (0.012 – 0.014, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT |
|
* … smaller is best
When it involves the GPU, you will have the selection between the RTX 4060 and RTX 4070; the extra highly effective variant is put in in our take a look at unit. In the skinny Aero, it usually consumes round 105 W. The most is 115 plus 25 W Dynamic Boost, however our colleague Andreas lately identified in his assessment of the cardboard that hardly any efficiency will increase happen above 100 W for the RTX 4070.
In the artificial 3DMarks, the cardboard is on the anticipated degree, though we do not have too many different measurements in our database. After all, it’s often forward of competing units with an RTX 3080 Ti, whereas the predecessor with its RTX 3080 Ti can be crushed by nearly 20 p.c, the CreatorPro by 30 p.c. Even the Blade 18 with the identical GPU and nominally sooner CPU is barely behind. The Alienware x15 R2 with its RTX 3080 Ti, however, is barely forward.
Quite a lot of 3D efficiency is misplaced in Battery Mode, with the rating in Fire Strike dropping by nearly 70 p.c!
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (28374 – 31054, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (781 – 49247, n=234, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11683 – 12529, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (224 – 22479, n=235, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H |
|
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33703 factors | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 55475 factors | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25526 factors | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 13175 factors | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12029 factors | |
Help | ||
| Average of sophistication Gaming (51 – 668, n=10, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (9 – 142, n=65, final 2 years) |
|
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (20 – 24, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (17 – 168, n=67, final 2 years) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (34 – 37, n=5) |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (147 – 698, n=77, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H |
|
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 – 304, n=5) |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX |
|
* … smaller is best
In gaming, the Aero 16 is simply overtaken by the Blade 18 total, and solely due to the weak leads to DOTA 2 Reborn and X-Plane 11.11. The Aero even has the sting in GPU-heavy video games. This is attention-grabbing as a result of the RTX 4070 is allowed 140 W within the Blade, however solely 105 W within the Aero, which confirms that it makes little sense to run the cardboard above 100 W in the meanwhile.
Overall, it may well deal with all video games as much as 2K and typically even above, though the cardboard typically runs out of steam in very demanding video games at 4K.
Ray tracing efficiency, however, is excellent. In Cyberpunkt, it solely drops from round 85 to 65 fps with activated ray tracing at 1080p.
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (8.61 – 216, n=225, final 2 years) |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (4.18 – 151.6, n=225, final 2 years) |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S |
|
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|
| Average of sophistication Gaming (10.9 – 421, n=227, final 2 years) |
|
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S |
|
| Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
|
| Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU |
|
The Aero 16 doesn’t supply Advanced Optimus, and the identical applies to Nvidia’s Whisper Mode. However, a MUX change is obtainable in an effort to manually change between iGPU and dGPU.
In gaming mode, the body price in Witcher 3 is sort of fixed for over an hour and is above that of a Razer Blade 18.
The GPU’s energy consumption is sort of fixed at round 105 W, which implies that each the core clock (2,350 MHz) and reminiscence clock (2,000 MHz) are additionally very fixed. The card heats as much as about 80 °C.
The slim Aero 16 will get fairly loud in Gaming Mode below heavy stress. Gaming or our stress take a look at causes the followers to spin as much as 55 dB, which is louder than the competitors, however not stunning given the skinny type issue.
In Creator Mode, the amount drops from the 55 dB of Gaming Mode to round 50 dB in stress testing. This brings the Aero nearer to the competitors, which has an identical noise degree. Only Meeting Mode tries to maintain the gadget actually quiet.
Noise Level
| Idle | 23 / 23 / 33.64 dB(A) | |
| Load | 51.49 / 55.24 dB(A) | |
 | ||
30 dB 40 dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
min: | ||
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| off / setting * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23.5 -2% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 24.1 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 30 -30% | 23.8 -3% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 27.1 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 32 -39% | 23.8 -3% | 26 -13% | 25 -9% | 27.1 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.64 | 33 2% | 26.8 20% | 26 23% | 28 17% | 27.1 19% |
| Load Average * | 51.49 | 45 13% | 37.3 28% | 48 7% | 42 18% | 42.9 17% |
| Witcher 3 extremely * | 55.27 | 50 10% | 48 13% | 50 10% | 44 20% | |
| Load Maximum * | 55.24 | 52 6% | 53.5 3% | 54.6 1% | 50 9% | 47 15% |
* … smaller is best
Despite its slim case, the Aero performs properly on this discipline. The comparatively loud followers and the steel case dissipate the warmth properly, in order that the new spots on the again stay properly under 50 °C. The predecessor and a number of opponents fare worse right here. The palm rests are at all times inside a cushty vary.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 41 °C = 106 F Average: 36 °C = 97 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 47 °C = 117 F Average: 38.1 °C = 101 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 43 °C = 109 F | Room Temperature 18 °C = 64 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The common temperature for the higher aspect below maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, in comparison with the typical of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the units within the class Gaming.
(±) The most temperature on the higher aspect is 41 °C / 106 F, in comparison with the typical of 40.4 °C / 105 F, starting from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the category Gaming.
(-) The backside heats as much as a most of 47 °C / 117 F, in comparison with the typical of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle utilization, the typical temperature for the higher aspect is 21.8 °C / 71 F, in comparison with the gadget common of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the typical temperature for the higher aspect is 36.8 °C / 98 F, in comparison with the gadget common of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching pores and skin temperature as a most (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are subsequently not scorching.
(-) The common temperature of the palmrest space of comparable units was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
In stress testing, the CPU is ready to eat 105 W briefly bursts earlier than falling to a relentless 62 W after just a few seconds. At the identical time, the clock begins briefly at 4.1 GHz earlier than dropping to round 2.9 GHz. However, this doesn’t stay fixed however fluctuates with temperature. When the core temperatures attain 90 °C, the clock is throttled barely, after which the temperatures drop once more. At simply over 80 °C, the clock price then rises barely once more, and many others.
The GPU clock additionally fluctuates repeatedly between 1.7 and 2.4 GHz. In distinction, the reminiscence clock rises and falls from 2 GHz to 1.75 GHz. The similar waveform is clear within the GPU temperature, which fluctuates roughly between 70 and 80 °C. The energy consumption by no means reaches its most within the stress take a look at, however hovers solely round 67 W.
| CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2,9 | 1.990 | 84 | 76 |
| Witcher 3 Stress | 1,8 | 2.350 | 69 | 80 |
Gigabyte has put in two stereo audio system with 2 W every, which is usually normal. Unfortunately, the audio system aren’t actually convincing in any self-discipline: they’re fairly loud, however are unable to ship properly-balanced mids or highs.
In addition to the digital outputs, the three.5 mm headset slot can be utilized for exterior units.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes could be checked and unchecked to check units)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF audio evaluation
(±) | speaker loudness is common however good (81.68 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | almost no bass – on common 15.6% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is common (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | larger mids – on common 12.8% larger than median
(-) | mids will not be linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 okHz
(±) | larger highs – on common 11% larger than median
(-) | highs will not be linear (16.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(-) | total sound is just not linear (47% distinction to median)
Compared to similar class
» 100% of all examined units on this class have been higher, 0% comparable, 0% worse
» The greatest had a delta of 6%, common was 17%, worst was 47%
Compared to all units examined
» 100% of all examined units have been higher, 0% comparable, 0% worse
» The greatest had a delta of three%, common was 20%, worst was 65%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W audio evaluation
(+) | audio system can play comparatively loud (94.7 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | almost no bass – on common 15.6% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is common (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – only one.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 okHz
(±) | larger highs – on common 6.6% larger than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(+) | total sound is linear (11.1% distinction to median)
Compared to similar class
» 12% of all examined units on this class have been higher, 3% comparable, 85% worse
» The greatest had a delta of three%, common was 17%, worst was 41%
Compared to all units examined
» 7% of all examined units have been higher, 2% comparable, 92% worse
» The greatest had a delta of three%, common was 20%, worst was 65%
Energy consumption is excellent, particularly in comparison with the earlier era. In the predecessor, the ability-hungry RTX 3080 Ti was additionally throttled at 105 W. In the gaming benchmarks, you may see that the outdated card performs noticeably worse whereas consuming considerably extra. The new RTX 40x era is clearly rather more environment friendly. More data on the effectivity of the brand new RTX 40x era could be discovered right here.
When gaming with Witcher 3, the typical consumption is round 158 W. The medium-sized normal energy provide from Chicony is rated at 240 W and copes properly with load peaks of as much as 192 W in stress testing.
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Phison ESR01TBMFCT, AMOLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560×1600, 18.00 | Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840×2400, 16.00 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS-Level, 1920×1200, 16.00 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of sophistication Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idle Minimum * | 11.8 | 26 -120% | 24.5 -108% | 11.1 6% | 8 32% | 10.8 8% | 14.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(8 – 24.5, n=4) -25% | 14.5 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3 – 64, n=173, final 2 years) -23% |
| Idle Average * | 16.1 | 30 -86% | 34.1 -112% | 11.4 29% | 11 32% | 16.3 -1% | 21.3 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(15 – 34.1, n=4) -32% | 19.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6.5 – 68.2, n=173, final 2 years) -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17 | 37 -118% | 47.7 -181% | 14.4 15% | 16 6% | 16.9 1% | 29.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(17 – 47.7, n=4) -76% | 26.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(8.9 – 76, n=172, final 2 years) -58% |
| Load Average * | 100.6 | 127 -26% | 140 -39% | 137.4 -37% | 97 4% | 111.7 -11% | 115.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(100.6 – 140, n=4) -15% | 113.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(48.4 – 202, n=173, final 2 years) -13% |
| Witcher 3 extremely * | 158 | 176 -11% | 202 -28% | 136 14% | 161.5 -2% | 152.1 4% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 192 | 236 -23% | 261 -36% | 197 -3% | 168 12% | 177.4 8% | 242 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(192 – 267, n=4) -26% | 235 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(103.1 – 418, n=172, final 2 years) -22% |
* … smaller is best
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (exterior Monitor): Ø107 (95.65-152.85)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (exterior Monitor): Ø126.2 (124-134)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (exterior Monitor): Ø205 (199-216)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (exterior Monitor): Ø153.3 (151.16-155.33)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (exterior Monitor): Ø142.6 (139-150)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (exterior Monitor): Ø204 (201-210)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280×720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (exterior Monitor): Ø157.2 (148.52-172.69)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280×720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (exterior Monitor): Ø170.4 (167-184)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280×720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (exterior Monitor): Ø198.8 (181.6-228)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920×1080 The Witcher 3 extremely (exterior Monitor): Ø158.6 (152.66-167.99)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; 1920×1080 The Witcher 3 extremely (exterior Monitor): Ø170.4 (166-176)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920×1080 The Witcher 3 extremely (exterior Monitor): Ø194.2 (190.3-223)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (exterior Monitor): Ø12.5 (5.9317-18.857)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (exterior Monitor): Ø25.1 (22.7-44.2)
Battery runtimes rely closely on the chosen mode, and the intense OLED display screen additionally drains fairly a little bit of juice. The laptop nonetheless has an 88 Wh battery. Due to the general decrease consumption, longer runtimes could be achieved with a properly-chosen vitality saving mode.
When watching a movie or browsing the net at lowered brightness, we get just below 7.5 hours every, an excellent worth. Gigabyte has mechanically activated the vitality-saving mode right here. At most brightness, the runtime falls to five.5 hours.
Battery Runtime
| WiFi Websurfing | 7h 28min | |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness | 5h 30min | |
| Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p | 7h 22min | |
| Load (most brightness) | 2h 06min |
| Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | Alienware x15 R2 P111F i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of sophistication Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H.264 | 442 | 345 -22% | 559 26% | 490 11% | 452 2% | 372 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(56 – 643, n=83, last 2 years) -16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 448 | 362.5 -19% | 310 -31% | 469 5% | 344 -23% | 381 -15% | 359 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57 – 724, n=171, final 2 years) -20% |
| Load | 126 | 58 -54% | 62 -51% | 133 6% | 96 -24% | 88.5 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(36 – 228, n=148, last 2 years) -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 749 | 533 | 576 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(57 – 1212, n=95, final 2 years) |
Pros
+skinny, secure steel housing
+3x USB-C (incl. 2x Thunderbolt 4)
+straightforward upkeep
+16 inch OLED show, HDR600
+a lot of handbook choices within the management heart
+excessive CPU and GPU efficiency
+comparatively cool and economical
Cons
–excessive worth
–60 Hz show solely
–loud in gaming mode
–driver latencies nonetheless fairly excessive
–somewhat weak audio system
Until now, excessive-efficiency laptops have usually been huge, loud and scorching, making them appropriate for both gamers or creatives, relying on the design. In the long run, we’d ideally like silent, cool and, if want be, small, cell laptops. The Aero is an effective step on this path, even when the present know-how is much from splendid.
The Aero performs higher than its thicker predecessor with the RTX 3080 Ti (additionally solely 105 W), however its environment friendly RTX 4070 consumes noticeably much less and stays cooler, although not quieter. If you are trying for discreet, you will profit from the numerous energy modes and handbook setting choices within the Control Center. This lets you adapt the efficiency and emissions of the Aero to the respective state of affairs or setting. Because the current Aero scores higher within the “Gaming” ranking class (88%) than within the “Multimedia” class (86%), we’re ranking it as a gaming pocket book.
Gamers is perhaps bothered by the truth that the in any other case nice OLED show can solely function at 60 Hz. Otherwise all different factors of criticism, such because the unbalanced audio system, are comparatively gentle.
The Aero 16 OLED not solely has an excellent display screen, however can be significantly skinny and, due to the environment friendly RTX 4070, additionally highly effective and but comparatively economical and cool.
The competitors by no means sleeps and can be exploring the chances of the brand new RTX 40x era. We have solely reviewed just a few up to now, so alternate options are nonetheless uncommon.
Interested patrons can examine straight by way of Gigabyte’s official product web page right here, the place you click on on Buy and choose your corresponding area and nation from the drop down record. You will then be ahead to a listing of on-line shops which will record the laptop in your nation.
In the US, for instance, Amazon lists the 2 configurations of the Gigabyte Aero 16 OLED, specifically one with an i9-13900H and 32 GB RAM and the opposite with an i7-13700H and 16 GB RAM. Both are US$2.299,00 and US$2.099,00, respectively. Of course, this isn’t consultant of worldwide availability, which is more likely to fluctuate relying on regional and delivery components.
Prices are as of 12.03.2023 and topic to alter.
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
–
03/08/2023 v7
Christian Hintze
Connectivity
65 / 80 → 82%
Application Performance
96%
Gaming – Weighted Average
More Articles for this Device
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF (Aero 16 Series)
Transparency
The current assessment pattern was made obtainable to the writer as a mortgage by the producer or a store for the needs of assessment. The lender had no affect on this assessment, nor did the producer obtain a duplicate of this assessment earlier than publication. There was no obligation to publish this assessment.
A C64 marked my entry into the world of PCs. I spent my pupil internship within the restore division of a pc store and on the finish of the day I used to be allowed to assemble my very own 486 PC from “workshop remnants”. As a results of this, I later studied pc science on the Humboldt University in Berlin, with psychology additionally being added to my research. After my first job as a analysis assistant on the college, I went to London for a 12 months and labored for Sega in pc recreation translation high quality assurance. This included engaged on video games akin to Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed and Company of Heroes. I’ve been writing for Notebookcheck since 2017.
Translator: Jacob Fisher – Translator – 169 articles printed on Notebookcheck since 2022
Growing up in regional Australia, I first grew to become acquainted with computer systems in my early teenagers after a damaged leg from a soccer (soccer) match quickly condemned me to a predominately indoor life-style. Soon afterwards I used to be constructing my very own methods. Now I stay in Germany, having moved right here in 2014, the place I examine philosophy and anthropology. I’m significantly fascinated by how pc know-how has essentially and dramatically reshaped human tradition, and the way it continues to take action.
Christian Hintze, 2023-03-12 (Update: 2023-03-12)
…. to be continued
Read the Original Article
Copyright for syndicated content material belongs to the linked Source : NotebookCheck – https://www.notebookcheck.net/Slim-Gigabyte-AERO-16-OLED-laptop-review-Efficient-RTX-4070-for-gamers-and-creatives.700616.0.html