Private AI summit with senators, titans of tech garners controversy

Private AI summit with senators, titans of tech garners controversy

CEO perception discussion board —

With 14 of 22 attendees being CEOs, some consultants say key voices have been lacking.

Benj Edwards

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 13: Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrive to the Senate bipartisan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Insight Forum on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on September 13, 2023. (Photo by Elizabeth Frantz for The Washington Post)

Enlarge / Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrive to the Senate bipartisan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Insight Forum on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on September 13, 2023.

Getty Images

On Wednesday, US Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) hosted an “AI Insight Forum” within the Senate’s workplace constructing about potential AI regulation. Attendees included billionaires and modern-day business titans reminiscent of Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Jensen Huang of Nvidia. But this closely company visitor listing—with 14 out of 22 being CEOs—had some scratching their heads.

“This is the room you pull together when your staffers want pictures with tech industry AI celebrities. It’s not the room you’d assemble when you want to better understand what AI is, how (and for whom) it functions, and what to do about it,” wrote Signal President Meredith Whittaker on X.

The CEO-heavy listing had others questioning the technical AI acumen of the attendees. “I hope that Schumer and others pivot to hear counterpoints from the many technical people who are good at explaining tech,” stated Dr. Margaret Mitchell of AI platform Hugging Face, whose CEO attended the assembly. “These CEOs are largely not. And they are very much incentivized to obscure critical details, to the extent they themselves understand them.”

Mitchell additionally raised issues concerning the lack of technically expert girls within the assembly. Overall, seven of the 22 invitees have been lady, however not all of them maintain technical roles in AI, together with representatives from the AFL-CIO and the Writers Guild. “Women are technical, but you wouldn’t know that from Schumer’s invitees—and this is a massive problem if we want to create AI regulation that helps AI work for everyone,” Mitchell stated.

Enlarge / Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and X, speaks to reporters as he leaves the “AI Insight Forum” on the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on September 13, 2023 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Some Senators criticized the character of the assembly as effectively. “I believe it’s ridiculous that each one these monopolists are all right here to inform senators tips on how to form the regulatory framework to allow them to make the utmost quantity of cash,” stated Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).

Despite the controversy, the assembly drew bipartisan curiosity, with greater than 60 senators collaborating. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Schumer and Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.) expressed optimism concerning the Senate’s readiness to think about legislative proposals. However, Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) identified that the method of drafting applicable laws would take time. “Are we ready to go out and write legislation? Absolutely not,” Reuters quoted Rounds as saying. “We’re not there.”

While the assembly was closed to media and the general public, Reuters and The New York Times reported on some of the dialogue, carried out in non-public in order that nobody would “play to the press,” Schumer stated.

According to Reuters, Musk argued for the need of a “referee” within the AI area. He described the regulation of AI akin to a sports activities recreation, the place guidelines guarantee truthful play and shield the individuals. “It’s important for us to have a referee to ensure that companies take actions that are safe and in the interest of the general public,” Musk stated.

The multi-billionaire, who manages varied tech ventures, together with the social media platform X, framed the assembly as a “service to humanity,” suggesting its ramifications “may go down in history as very important to the future of civilization.” Musk’s feedback echo his earlier requires a six-month pause the event of AI programs extra highly effective than OpenAI’s GPT-4, which some critics say missed present hurt from AI in favor of unproven, hypothetical risks.

On the opposite hand, Meta’s Zuckerberg reportedly pushed for a collaborative strategy between the federal government and tech corporations. He urged Congress to “engage with AI to support innovation and safeguards,” highlighting the strategic benefit of having American corporations set international requirements.

Due to the speedy rise of generative AI within the public eye over the previous yr—particularly associated to the success of AI assistant ChatGPT and warnings about potential risks of hypothetical super-intelligent machines—synthetic intelligence instruments have fallen squarely into the crosshairs of potential US authorities regulation, with heavy curiosity lately from Schumer and others in Congress. Last week, US Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Hawley proposed a bipartisan legislative framework that may require corporations engaged on “high-risk” AI functions, reminiscent of GPT-4, to acquire a authorities license.

The name for AI regulation has grow to be more and more international, with international locations worldwide grappling to set guidelines about facial recognition, deepfakes, coaching knowledge units, and extra. This week, corporations Adobe, IBM, and Nvidia introduced they’d joined President Joe Biden’s voluntary AI commitments, which mandate measures like watermarking AI-generated content material to flag its synthetic origins.

With a lot hype on the market—and so many {dollars} flying round—business consultants like Mitchell are frightened that the technical particulars might get misplaced within the dialog. “The right thing to do would have been to communicate first with people who are technically skilled and who can speak to peoples’ rights,” stated Mitchell. “They would have set the foundation of Schumer’s understanding. Instead the foundation of his understanding is now aligned to short-term profit maximization.”

…. to be continued
Read the Original Article
Copyright for syndicated content material belongs to the linked Source : Ars Technica – https://arstechnica.com/?p=1968348

Exit mobile version