The Nvidia GeForce MX550 (GN18-S5-A1, TU117-670-A1 Chip) is an entry-stage cellular graphics card for laptops. It is predicated on the outdated Turing TU117 chip (because the older MX450) and makes use of a 64 Bit reminiscence bus with GDDR6 graphics reminiscence. First benchmarks present a 17% efficiency improve in comparison with the outdated GeForce MX450 which may point out extra shaders (1024 as an alternative of 896). The equally named GeForce MX570 is round 30% quicker and makes use of the Ampere GA107 chip.
The gaming efficiency ought to be much like the older GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and due to this fact demanding video games will solely run in low settings fluently.
The TU117 chip is manufactured on a 12nm TSMC course of and ought to be rated at 25 Watt TGP (because the outdated MX450).
GeForce MX500 Series
| |||||||
| Codename | GN18-S5 | ||||||
| Architecture | Turing | ||||||
| Pipelines | 1024 – unified | ||||||
| Core Speed | 1320 (Boost) MHz | ||||||
| Memory Speed | 12000 MHz | ||||||
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit | ||||||
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | ||||||
| Shared Memory | no | ||||||
| API | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 | ||||||
| Power Consumption | 15-25 Watt | ||||||
| expertise | 12 nm | ||||||
| Features | Vulkan 1.2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, GPU Boost, Optimus, PCIe 4.0, Game Ready Drivers, Win 10 / 11 | ||||||
| Date of Announcement | 17.12.2021 | ||||||
Benchmarks
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2695 avg: 2771 median: 2800 (9%) max: 2818 Points
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2419 avg: 2472 median: 2470 (7%) max: 2526 Points
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
29680 Points (32%)
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
40364 Points (11%)
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5764 avg: 5869 median: 5869 (10%) max: 5974 Points
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5994 avg: 6126 median: 6125.5 (7%) max: 6257 Points
…
…
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4807 avg: 4928 median: 4927.5 (6%) max: 5048 Points
…
…
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10068 avg: 10320 median: 10319.5 (15%) max: 10571 Points
…
…
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 9679 avg: 10005 median: 10005 (9%) max: 10331 Points
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. complete +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. complete
36560 Points (11%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
31800 Points (18%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb4_s16’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +
42476 Points (59%)
…
…
Unigine Valley 1.0 – Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.1 fps (9%)
…
…
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
262 Seconds (39%)
…
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
236 Seconds (88%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1676’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 sw-04
67.6 fps (21%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1674’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 snx-03
11.2 fps (2%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1672’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 showcase-02
28.9 fps (6%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1670’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 medical-02
22.8 fps (9%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1668’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 maya-05
95.1 fps (11%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1666’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 power-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 power-02
0.6 fps (0%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1664’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 creo-02
76.9 fps (13%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1662’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 catia-05
51.1 fps (6%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1660’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 3dsmax-06
52.2 fps (9%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2436’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 2020 v1 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
60.3 fps (12%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2435’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
11.1 fps (3%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2434’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
10.6 fps (15%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2433’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
113.2 fps (19%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2432’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 power-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 power-03 1080p
0.6 fps (1%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2431’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
45.1 fps (27%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2430’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
19.1 fps (16%)
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb769_s2429’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
20.9 fps (10%)
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 169.3 avg: 173.5 median: 173.5 (45%) max: 177.6 fps
…
…
{ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(ingredient => {ingredient.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
28.7 fps (12%)
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
60 fps (12%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
62.7 fps (11%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
60 fps (8%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
155.2 fps (11%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (2%)
…
…
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
153.9 fps (1%)
…
…
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
523 Samples/s (2%)
…
…
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1058 Samples/s (2%)
…
…
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6176 factors (7%)
…
…
Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – exterior Monitor *
47.8 Watt (7%)
…
…
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – exterior Monitor *
min: 53.1 avg: 56 median: 56 (8%) max: 58.9 Watt
…
…
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
52.5 Watt (12%)
…
…
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 extremely Power Efficiency
0.5 Points per Watt (47%)
…
…
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 extremely Power Efficiency – exterior Monitor
min: 0.452 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (46%) max: 0.4924 Points per Watt
…
…
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers imply a better efficiency
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of evaluation laptops. The efficiency will depend on the used graphics reminiscence, clock price, processor, system settings, drivers, and working techniques. So the outcomes do not should be consultant for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed info on the benchmark outcomes, click on on the fps quantity.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
4K 3840×2160
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280×720
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
» The benchmarks point out that the sport is just not playable within the examined settings.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With most examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1920×1080
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
» With most examined laptops playable intimately settings med..
…
…
med. 1366×768
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.
…
…
med. 1366×768
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
…
…
med. 1366×768
…
…
excessive 1920×1080
…
…
extremely 1920×1080
…
…
» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.
For extra video games that may be playable and a listing of all video games and graphics playing cards go to our Gaming List
v1.22
log 07. 05:40:15
#0 no ids present in url (ought to be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 didn’t recreate cache, as it’s lower than 5 days outdated! Created at Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:24:00 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.038s … 0.039s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.039s
#5 begin showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.039s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for machine 11110 +0.012s … 0.052s
#7 bought single benchmarks 11110 +0.02s … 0.072s
#8 bought avg benchmarks for units +0s … 0.072s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.571s … 0.642s
#10 earlier than gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.642s
#11 Got 87 rows for recreation benchmarks. +0.015s … 0.657s
#12 composed SQL question for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.657s
#13 bought knowledge and put it in $dataArray +0.011s … 0.668s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.381s … 1.049s
#15 return log +0.035s … 1.084s
Notebook critiques with NVIDIA GeForce MX550 graphics card
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3 evaluation – Business laptop computer is worse with Intel and Nvidia
After we already examined the ThinkPad T14 G3 with the AMD processor, we now check out the model with an Intel Core i7-1260P and devoted GeForce MX550. W…
Intel Core i7-1260P | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | 14.00″http://www.notebookcheck.net/” 1.5 kg
Battle of the entry-stage GPUs – Nvidia GeForce MX550 & Intel Arc A350M Review
Increasingly highly effective built-in GPUs are an enormous drawback for entry-stage GPUs. Nvidia nonetheless gives the GeForce MX550 on this section and Intel simply launched the …
Intel Core i7-1260P | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | 23.80″http://www.notebookcheck.net/” 6.8 kg
Acer Aspire 5 A517-53G-757V: Intel Core i7-1255U, 17.30″, 2.3 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517-53G-757V
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-57CW: Intel Core i5-1235U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-57CW
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-74D3: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-74D3
HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0754ng: Intel Core i5-1235U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0754ng
Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120G: Intel Core i5-12450H, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120G
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2022, i5-12450H MX550: Intel Core i5-12450H, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2022, i5-12450H MX550
HP 15-dw4020nu: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP 15-dw4020nu
Dell Latitude 15 5531, i5-12600H MX550: Intel Core i5-12600H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Dell Latitude 15 5531, i5-12600H MX550
» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed record of all laptop computer GPUs sorted by class and efficiency.
» Benchmark List
Sort and prohibit laptop computer GPUs primarily based on efficiency in artificial benchmarks.
» Notebook Gaming List
Playable video games for every graphics card and their common FPS outcomes.
Class 1
Class 2
Radeon PRO W6600M *
Class 3
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs *
Class 4
Class 5
* Approximate place of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who is aware of how one can translate? Then be a part of our Team!
Details right here
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
below 300 USD/Euros, below 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-12-17)
…. to be continued
Read the Original Article
Copyright for syndicated content material belongs to the linked Source : NotebookCheck – https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-MX550-GPU-Benchmarks-and-Specs.586933.0.html