NVIDIA GeForce MX110 GPU – Benchmarks and Specs – NotebookVerify.internet Tech

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 GPU – Benchmarks and Specs – NotebookCheck.net Tech

The Nvidia GeForce MX110 is an entry-stage graphics card for laptops that was launched on the finish of 2017. It is a renamed Geforce 920MX and primarily based on the Maxwell GM108 chip with a diminished shader rely of 256.  According to our sources the TDP of 5-12 Watt and the assist for DDR3 and GDDR5 can be specified.

The efficiency is on par with the GeForce 920MX and is dependent upon the used graphics reminiscence. Therefore, demanding video games from 2015 might not run in any respect fluently or solely in lowest settings. Less demanding video games, like The Sims 4, ought to be playable in medium to excessive settings.

GeForce MX100 Series

Codename N16V-GMR1
Architecture Maxwell
Pipelines 256 – unified
Core Speed 965 – 993 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width 64 Bit
Memory Type DDR3, GDDR5
Shared Memory no
API DirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
know-how 28 nm
Features Optimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GameWorks
Date of Announcement 01.01.2018
Link to Manufacturer Page https://www.geforce.com/hardware/noteboo…

Benchmarks

Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

4 pt (4%)

3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score

min: 500     avg: 515     median: 515 (2%)     max: 530 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

min: 437     avg: 450.5     median: 450.5 (1%)     max: 464 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

min: 122046     avg: 124037     median: 124036 (14%)     max: 126027 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics

41631 Points (6%)

3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 9593     avg: 9825     median: 9867 (11%)     max: 10015 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 10858     avg: 11146     median: 11266 (4%)     max: 11314 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 1600     avg: 1629     median: 1641 (3%)     max: 1647 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 1666     avg: 1701     median: 1714 (2%)     max: 1722 Points

3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

52680 Points (7%)

3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score

min: 2367     avg: 2382     median: 2378 (3%)     max: 2400 Points

3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU

min: 2115     avg: 2125     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2140 Points

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. complete +

3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. complete

9124 Points (3%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX

7645 Points (4%)

3DMark 03 – 3DMark 03 – Standard

30463 Points (16%)

3DMark 05 – 3DMark 05 – Standard

22463 Points (25%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb4_s16’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +

14612 Points (20%)

Unigine Valley 1.0 – Unigine Valley 1.0 DX

9 fps (3%)

Unigine Heaven 3.0 – Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11

21.8 fps (7%)

Unigine Heaven 3.0 – Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL

20.9 fps (9%)

Unigine Heaven 2.1 – Heaven 2.1 excessive

28.5 fps (5%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb22_s38’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +

Cinebench R10 – Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)

4147 factors (3%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit

min: 55     avg: 57.2     median: 57.8 (15%)     max: 58.8 fps

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit

99.6 % (100%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s641’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16

74.9 fps (2%)

{aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});doc.querySelectorAll(‘.sb216_s640’).forEach(aspect => {aspect.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 – GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16

129.9 fps (1%)

GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan

54.2 fps (15%)

GFXBench 3.0 – GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen

72.2 fps (4%)

GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

24.8 fps (15%)

GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

14.9 fps (3%)

GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

36.9 fps (16%)

GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

39.5 fps (3%)

GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen

31.7 fps (1%)

GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen

36.6 fps (0%)

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU

259 Samples/s (1%)

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU

468 Samples/s (1%)

ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result

1214 factors (1%)

Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – exterior Monitor *

21 Watt (3%)

Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – exterior Monitor *

25 Watt (3%)

Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *

33.2 Watt (7%)

Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 extremely

986 MHz (49%)

Clock Speed – GPU Clock Speed Furmark

756 MHz (30%)

– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers imply a better efficiency

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of overview laptops. The efficiency is dependent upon the used graphics reminiscence, clock fee, processor, system settings, drivers, and working methods. So the outcomes do not must be consultant for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed info on the benchmark outcomes, click on on the fps quantity.

Horizon Zero Dawn

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Lowest Preset 1920×1080

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

Additional Benchmarks

Low Preset TAA 1920×1080

med. 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings low.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..

med. 1920×1080

excessive 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» The benchmarks point out that the sport shouldn’t be playable within the examined settings.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings med..

Additional Benchmarks

Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080

Lowest Settings potential 1920×1080

med. 1366×768

excessive 1920×1080

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1366×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1366×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1366×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1366×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings extremely.

med. 1366×768

excessive 1366×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

med. 1360×768

excessive 1360×768

extremely 1920×1080

» With all examined laptops playable intimately settings excessive.

For extra video games that could be playable and a listing of all video games and graphics playing cards go to our Gaming List

v1.22

log 10. 17:45:13

#0 no ids present in url (ought to be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#2 didn’t recreate cache, as it’s lower than 5 days previous! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s … 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.03s … 0.031s

#4 did output specs +0s … 0.031s

#5 begin showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for machine 8130 +0.021s … 0.052s

#7 acquired single benchmarks 8130 +0.02s … 0.073s

#8 acquired avg benchmarks for gadgets +0s … 0.073s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.474s … 0.547s

#10 earlier than gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.547s

#11 Got 254 rows for sport benchmarks. +0.012s … 0.559s

#12 composed SQL question for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.559s

#13 acquired information and put it in $dataArray +0.042s … 0.601s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.169s … 1.77s

#15 return log +0.061s … 1.831s

Notebook opinions with NVIDIA GeForce MX110 graphics card

HP 250 G7 in overview: Scrap recycling accomplished the HP method

The HP 250 G7 affords a present Ice Lake processor, a GeForce graphics core, 8 GB of RAM, and an NVMe SSD for slightly below 500 Euros (~$596). The constructed-in show …
Intel Core i5-1035G1 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″http://www.notebookcheck.net/” 1.8 kg

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110) Laptop Review

Xiaomi has now constructed up a proud collection of notebooks alongside its Mi smartphones. Our focus for this overview is the Mi Notebook 15.6, which lacks the Pro, Air…
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″http://www.notebookcheck.net/” 2.2 kg

HP 15 (i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Display disappointment. Hewlett Packard’s 15.6-inch pocket book includes a Core i5 CPU, a quick NVMe SSD, and a devoted GeForce MX 110 GPU with GDDR5 video RAM. U…
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60″http://www.notebookcheck.net/” 1.8 kg

Samsung Book X45: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60″, 2 kg

  External Review » Samsung Book X45

Asus F409JB-EK013T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg

  External Review » Asus F409JB-EK013T

Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 2.1 kg

  External Review » Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU

HP 15-da1031tx: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

  External Review » HP 15-da1031tx

Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg

  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE

Asus X540UB-GQ491T: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

  External Review » Asus X540UB-GQ491T

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D): Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 2.2 kg

  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)

Asus K540UB-GQ066T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60″, 2.2 kg

  External Review » Asus K540UB-GQ066T

HP 15-da1014ns: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

  External Review » HP 15-da1014ns

HP 15-da0058ns: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

  External Review » HP 15-da0058ns

Asus X540UB-DM024T: Intel Core i3-6006U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg

  External Review » Asus X540UB-DM024T

HP 250 G7-15S40ES: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60″, 1.8 kg

   » No suggestion for the HP 250 G7, mistaken show alternative

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed checklist of all laptop computer GPUs sorted by class and efficiency.

» Benchmark List
Sort and prohibit laptop computer GPUs primarily based on efficiency in artificial benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable video games for every graphics card and their common FPS outcomes.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs *

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate place of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-10-12)

…. to be continued
Read the Original Article
Copyright for syndicated content material belongs to the linked Source : NotebookCheck – https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-MX110-GPU-Benchmarks-and-Specs.258058.0.html

Exit mobile version