Motorola Razr 2022 review – Much less compromises with the foldable phone – NotebookCheck.internet Reviews

Motorola Razr 2022 review – Much less compromises with the foldable phone – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

A should in 2005 – and immediately? More cameras, bigger battery, excessive-finish SoC, and nonetheless cheaper – Motorola’s Razr 2022 appears far more refined than its direct predecessor at first look. Find out right here whether or not the foldable smartphone additionally convinces us in the take a look at.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 …

Motorola Razr 2022

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 2nd show: 2.7 inches, 800×573 pixel, OLED, shiny: sure, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 

, 236 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio by way of USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B14/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78/​n79) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

peak x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 167 x 79.8 ( = 0.3 x 6.57 x 3.14 in)

Battery

3500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30W charging (Motorola TurboPower)

Charging

quick charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, OIS, LED-flash, video @4320p/​30fps (Kamera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, huge angle (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, video @1080p/​60fps

Additional options

Speakers: stereo audio system, charger, USB cable, SIM device, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.990W/​kg (head), 1.370W/​kg (physique); IP52-licensed; dimensions closed: 86.5×79.8x17mm, fanless

Weight

200 g ( = 7.05 oz / 0.44 kilos) ( = 0 oz / 0 kilos)

Note: The producer could use elements from completely different suppliers together with show panels, drives or reminiscence sticks with comparable specs.

ranking

date

mannequin

weight

drive

dimension

decision

worth from

87 %

01/2023

Motorola Razr 2022
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
200 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.70″ 2400×1080
76.1 %

06/2020

Motorola Razr 2019
SD 710, Adreno 616
205 g 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash 6.20″ 2142×876
87.9 %

10/2022

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
187 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.70″ 2640×1080
86.3 %

12/2022

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
262 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 8.02″ 2160×1914

Around 2005, the Motorola Razr V3 was the flip phone that everybody wished to personal. No marvel it’s nonetheless one in every of the finest-promoting telephones of all time.

The Motorola Razr 2022 can’t be fairly as compact attributable to the fashionable calls for on a smartphone, however it’s positively additionally particular with its foldable show. The predecessor Razr 2019 had its difficulties however nonetheless exerted a sure fascination. Let’s see what Motorola has improved in its successor.

The casing does with out the typical chin, which was already current in the first Razr fashions and which additionally made the Razr 2019 nonetheless had. The Razr 2022 is barely lighter than its predecessor and significantly wider, so it gives extra display screen house total. When folded, it’s about 1.8 centimeters thick and measures about 8 x 8.5 centimeters in width and size. Thus, it’s bulkier in the pocket than different smartphones, however it additionally matches into smaller pockets.

Motorola has basically reworked the hinge, which is now utterly silent, appears far more stable than in the predecessor and retains the show secure even in a half-open state, so you’ll be able to take selfies with a tripod, for instance.

The body is now fabricated from aluminum and the casing is protected by resistant Gorilla Glass 5.

The phone comes with 256 GB of mass storage for slightly below 1,200 Euros, which is 300 Euros cheaper than the predecessor at launch, and in addition gives twice as a lot storage. A microSD reader for reminiscence enlargement continues to be not accessible. However, it’s potential to insert 2 SIM playing cards if the phone is bought from a retailer.

{factor.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_316335’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_332580’).forEach(factor => {factor.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_332580’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_331676’).forEach(factor => {factor.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_331676’).checked = false;doc.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_332543’).forEach(factor => {factor.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});doc.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_332543’).checked = false;return false;” title=”cover all”>❌

172 mm / 6.77 inch 72 mm / 2.83 inch 6.9 mm / 0.2717 inch 205 g0.4519 lbs167 mm / 6.57 inch 79.8 mm / 3.14 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 200 g0.4409 lbs165.2 mm / 6.5 inch 71.9 mm / 2.83 inch 6.9 mm / 0.2717 inch 187 g0.4123 lbs161.6 mm / 6.36 inch 144.7 mm / 5.7 inch 5.4 mm / 0.2126 inch 262 g0.578 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Today’s requirements WiFi 6E and 5G are lastly on board in the Razr 2022; the predecessor was already outdated for a excessive-finish phone when it was launched. However, very quick Internet is now accessible by way of Wi-Fi, as we are able to verify after our take a look at with the reference router Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000. However, the information charges fluctuate fairly a bit throughout transmission.

Numerous 5G and 4G frequencies are supported, so you’ll be able to simply entry the cell Internet worldwide with Motorola’s Razr 2022.

The producer installs very pure Android 12 with out advert apps. At the time of testing, the safety patches are from December 2022 and are nonetheless fairly up-to-date. Motorola guarantees safety patches till October 2025 and no less than an improve to Android 13. Great: you’ll be able to test the standing of additional updates on the Motorola web site at any time.

The Motorola phone’s giant touchscreen may be operated very precisely and shortly due to good gliding properties and as much as 144 Hz body fee. Even the crease that the principal show will get when it’s folded is simply minimally noticeable after a number of days of use and isn’t annoying. The operation of the outer display screen is a bit slower attributable to the decrease body fee. This might be additionally attributable to the direct comparability with the quick principal display screen. Nevertheless, it may be operated reliably and can be utilized as a full-fledged secondary show.

Unlocking is feasible by way of Face Unlock, which works each when the phone is closed and opened. The fingerprint sensor may also be used for biometric person recognition. It is hidden on the proper aspect of the case in the standby button, so unlocking can also be potential in a closed state. The phone is unlocked very reliably and at once.

08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Recording entrance digital camera

While the predecessor needed to make do with a lame 16-megapixel single digital camera two years in the past, Motorola has put in a extra worth-acceptable twin digital camera with the Omnivision OV50A as the principal sensor and the Hynix HI336 as the huge-angle digital camera in the Razr 2022.

The principal sensor of the Razr 2022 can not fairly sustain with the sharpness of element of the iPhone 14 in our take a look at photographs, however it takes superb photographs total in daylight that might nonetheless use a bit extra distinction. Many particulars are nonetheless displayed in low mild, however the brightening is simply mediocre. Pictures from the huge-angle digital camera look very washed out intimately, however the sensor compensates the the distortion at the image’s edge effectively.

In the lab, the principal digital camera’s coloration copy is a bit too shiny in good lighting. The take a look at picture may be very sharp, even at the edges.

Videos may be recorded in 8K at a most of 30 fps, and the huge-angle digital camera is restricted to 4K. The publicity adjustment works shortly, however the autofocus could possibly be a bit extra exact; typically you’ll be able to see it pumping briefly.

There is a digital camera on the within the phone that takes good self-portraits. As a particular characteristic, you may as well use the principal digital camera for selfies and use the outer show as a viewfinder.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate inside the first picture. One click on modifications the place on touchscreens. One click on on the zoomed-in picture opens the unique in a brand new window. The first picture reveals the scaled {photograph} of the take a look at system.

Main digital cameraMain cameraLow GentleWide-angle

click on to load photos

21 ∆E

10.8 ∆E

17 ∆E

21.6 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

12.2 ∆E

17 ∆E

11.1 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

10 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

11.7 ∆E

16.5 ∆E

12.5 ∆E

3.4 ∆E

9.9 ∆E

14.5 ∆E

6.3 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

10.5 ∆E

14.5 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

ColorChecker Motorola Razr 2022: 11.61 ∆E min: 3.4 – max: 21.6 ∆E

15.6 ∆E

20 ∆E

25.1 ∆E

24.3 ∆E

26.2 ∆E

31.8 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

19.3 ∆E

18.5 ∆E

19.1 ∆E

25 ∆E

21.9 ∆E

20.6 ∆E

26.5 ∆E

11.8 ∆E

18.5 ∆E

19.9 ∆E

26.6 ∆E

22 ∆E

21.6 ∆E

22.9 ∆E

21.4 ∆E

16.9 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

ColorChecker Motorola Razr 2022: 20.83 ∆E min: 10.68 – max: 31.81 ∆E
Subpixel construction

The show of Motorola’s Razr 2022 is significantly bigger, particularly wider than the predecessor, and in addition has the next decision: it now gives an expanded Full HD with 2400 x 1080 pixels. In addition, additionally it is a lot brighter with 495 cd/m² than in the Razr 2019. However, it can not sustain with the rivals from Samsung or Xiaomi on this self-discipline.

A a lot larger body fee of 144 Hz can also be potential, which signifies that actions on the display screen are displayed extra easily and the system reacts extra on to inputs.

We measured PWM flickering at very low brightness, however this may be lowered to the refresh fee by way of the “Flicker Prevention” setting, so it must be less annoying.

We like the coloration copy, which we decided with the CalMAN software program and a spectrophotometer in the take a look at. A coloration forged is just not seen to the bare eye in the grayscale.

The outer show has a decision of 800 x 573 pixels, additionally it is contact-delicate and most apps may be began immediately there, so you may as well play YouTube movies, for instance.

489
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
499
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 495.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.99 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
92.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.202

Motorola Razr 2022
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.70
Motorola Razr 2019
P-OLED, 2142×876, 6.20
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED , 2640×1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160×1914, 8.02
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

1.2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.53, 0.59)

7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3, 4)

-483%

1.41 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.7205, 0.687)

-18%

2.97 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.455, 1.518)

-148%

Response Time Black / White *

0.69 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.35, 0.34)

8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(5, 3)

-1059%

1.52 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.7865, 0.7325)

-120%

1.56 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.8145, 0.745)

-126%

PWM Frequency

745

231.5

-69%

120

-84%

120

-84%

Brightness center

500

428

-14%

795

59%

1015

103%

Brightness

495

428

-14%

800

62%

1022

106%

Brightness Distribution

98

89

-9%

97

-1%

98

0%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.99

6.39

-221%

1

50%

1.6

20%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

5.37

10.83

-102%

2.5

53%

3.4

37%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

2.7

5

-85%

1.5

44%

2.6

4%

Gamma

2.202 100%

2.25 98%

2.37 93%

2.22 99%

CCT

6663 98%

7649 85%

6466 101%

6506 100%

* … smaller is best

Display Response Times

Display response occasions present how briskly the display screen is ready to change from one coloration to the subsequent. Slow response occasions can result in afterimages and might trigger transferring objects to seem blurry (ghosting). Gamers of quick-paced 3D titles ought to pay particular consideration to quick response occasions.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the display screen, some notebooks will merely cycle the backlight on and off in fast succession – a technique referred to as Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This biking frequency ought to ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If stated frequency is just too low, customers with delicate eyes could expertise pressure or complications and even discover the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 745 Hz

The show backlight glints at 745 Hz (Likely using PWM) .

The frequency of 745 Hz is kind of excessive, so most customers delicate to PWM mustn’t discover any flickering.

In comparability: 53 % of all examined units don’t use PWM to dim the show. If PWM was detected, a mean of 19504 (minimal: 5 – most: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement collection with fastened zoom stage and completely different brightness settings

The Razr 2022 lastly will get an actual excessive-finish SoC, particularly the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This places the efficiency of the clamshell phone on par with different excessive-finish telephones in the worth vary. The predecessor, which solely had an excellent mid-vary SoC, is much behind in the benchmarks.

With as much as 45.3 °C beneath excessive load, Motorola’s Razr 2022 can get very heat, particularly in the space round the cameras, and the heating is extra evident on the touchscreen than exterior. We additionally see vital efficiency losses of as much as 50% beneath extended load in the 3DMark stress take a look at.

The Razr 2022 comes with stereo audio system, however they aren’t that loud attributable to the restricted house, shortly appear overpowered, and total solely sound mediocre for a excessive-finish phone. Headphones may be linked by way of USB-C or Bluetooth. A lot of codecs can be found for the latter, together with LDHC and aptX TWS+.

The battery is significantly bigger than the predecessor’s 3,500 mAh. However, runtime followers is not going to be glad as a result of 9:25 hours in our WLAN take a look at are considerably higher than the predecessor however total fairly mediocre for a smartphone. You ought to get by the day with a low load, however there are hardly any reserves.

The phone expenses with as much as 30 watts, however it takes less than 2 hours to totally recharge the small battery.

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


1324 Points ∼100% +1%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


1305 Points ∼99%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (930 – 1356, n=15)





1293 Points ∼98% -1%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


1265 Points ∼96% -3%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (58 – 1885, n=263, final 2 years)





758 Points ∼57% -42%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


394 Points ∼30% -70%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


4237 Points ∼100% +3%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3987 – 4436, n=15)





4210 Points ∼99% +3%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


4106 Points ∼97%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


3987 Points ∼94% -3%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (291 – 5538, n=263, final 2 years)





2441 Points ∼58% -41%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


1448 Points ∼34% -65%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


13077 Points ∼100% +21%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (9166 – 13223, n=10)





11660 Points ∼89% +8%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


10823 Points ∼83%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


9166 Points ∼70% -15%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (91 – 13223, n=224, final 2 years)





4569 Points ∼35% -58%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


2006 Points ∼15% -81%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


20220 Points ∼100% +40%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (13986 – 20955, n=10)





19253 Points ∼95% +34%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


14418 Points ∼71%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


13986 Points ∼69% -3%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (73 – 20955, n=223, final 2 years)





6026 Points ∼30% -58%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


1866 Points ∼9% -87%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


5847 Points ∼100% +1%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


5780 Points ∼99%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3224 – 5857, n=10)





5015 Points ∼86% -13%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


4211 Points ∼72% -27%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (635 – 5857, n=223, final 2 years)





3387 Points ∼58% -41%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


2720 Points ∼47% -53%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


8130 Points ∼100%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 





8130 Points ∼100% 0%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (254 – 10062, n=200, final 2 years)





3194 Points ∼39% -61%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


11201 Points ∼100% +2%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (10982 – 11201, n=14)





11049 Points ∼99% 0%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


11022 Points ∼98% 0%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


11004 Points ∼98%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (247 – 12429, n=221, final 2 years)





4129 Points ∼37% -62%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


2867 Points ∼100% +2%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


2811 Points ∼98%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (2754 – 2873, n=14)





2805 Points ∼98% 0%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


2795 Points ∼97% -1%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (22 – 3383, n=203, final 2 years)





1124 Points ∼39% -60%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


2798 Points ∼100% +2%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (2698 – 2899, n=14)





2771 Points ∼99% +1%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


2745 Points ∼98%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


2726 Points ∼97% -1%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (101 – 3265, n=195, final 2 years)





1123 Points ∼40% -59%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (51 – 104, n=14)





84.1 fps ∼100% +3%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


82 fps ∼98%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


63 fps ∼75% -23%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


51 fps ∼61% -38%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (4.5 – 104, n=259, final 2 years)





33.7 fps ∼40% -59%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


17 fps ∼20% -79%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (71 – 136, n=14)





107.8 fps ∼100% +28%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


106 fps ∼98% +26%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


84 fps ∼78%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


71 fps ∼66% -15%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (1.9 – 136, n=260, final 2 years)





41.9 fps ∼39% -50%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


14 fps ∼13% -83%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


65 fps ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


62 fps ∼95% -5%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (32 – 86, n=14)





61.6 fps ∼95% -5%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


32 fps ∼49% -51%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (2.8 – 86, n=260, final 2 years)





23.8 fps ∼37% -63%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


11 fps ∼17% -83%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (34 – 52, n=16)





43.3 fps ∼100% +17%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


39 fps ∼90% +5%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


37 fps ∼85%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


34 fps ∼79% -8%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (0.7 – 52, n=260, final 2 years)





16.1 fps ∼37% -56%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


5.2 fps ∼12% -86%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


52566 Points ∼100% +131%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (17622 – 54646, n=14)





38944 Points ∼74% +71%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288


29168 Points ∼55% +28%

Average of sophistication Smartphone
  (3905 – 74261, n=193, final 2 years)





27456 Points ∼52% +21%

Motorola Razr 2022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192


22761 Points ∼43%

Motorola Razr 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144


9771 Points ∼19% -57%

Motorola Razr 2022 Motorola Razr 2019 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Average of sophistication Smartphone
Sequential Read 256KB

1768

510

-71%

1598.77

-10%

1882.11

6%

1777 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1014 – 2037, n=68)

1%

1024 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(90.5 – 1999, n=254, final 2 years)

-42%

Sequential Write 256KB

1149

186.4

-84%

987.09

-14%

1783.27

55%

1070 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(452 – 1833, n=68)

-7%

597 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(11.9 – 1833, n=254, final 2 years)

-48%

Random Read 4KB

315

88.6

-72%

308.23

-2%

342.67

9%

277 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(173.5 – 543, n=68)

-12%

189 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13.5 – 543, n=254, final 2 years)

-40%

Random Write 4KB

332

80.1

-76%

245.94

-26%

446.48

34%

300 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(197.5 – 490, n=69)

-10%

191.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13 – 503, n=255, final 2 years)

-42%

  44.8 °C
113 F
34.2 °C
94 F
29.3 °C
85 F
 
  45.3 °C
114 F
32.3 °C
90 F
29.1 °C
84 F
 
  45.3 °C
114 F
32.6 °C
91 F
29.6 °C
85 F
 
Maximum: 45.3 °C = 114 F
Average: 35.8 °C = 96 F
26.8 °C
80 F
32.6 °C
91 F
41.6 °C
107 F
28.2 °C
83 F
34.9 °C
95 F
41.7 °C
107 F
28.4 °C
83 F
33.2 °C
92 F
43.7 °C
111 F
Maximum: 43.7 °C = 111 F
Average: 34.6 °C = 94 F

Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 19.7 °C = 67 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The common temperature for the higher aspect beneath maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, in comparison with the common of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the units in the class Smartphone.
(-) The most temperature on the higher aspect is 45.3 °C / 114 F, in comparison with the common of 35 °C / 95 F, starting from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The backside heats as much as a most of 43.7 °C / 111 F, in comparison with the common of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle utilization, the common temperature for the higher aspect is 22.8 °C / 73 F, in comparison with the system common of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

051015202530354045505560Tooltip

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.4 (9.59-17)

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (15.9-16.7)

Motorola Razr 2022 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø39.7 (31.4-63.9)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.4 (29.3-64.7)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.534.6253530.53132.125.74032.530.45036.632.76330.330.5803122.110025.728.112525.636.116023.942.620019.746.125017.451.3315195540016.860.650017.863.263017.861.680022.667100022.671.912502266160021.561.3200021.965.2250020.672.731501773.5400016.273.8500015.47363001565.2800015.360.21000015.8661250016.560.81600017.464.7SPL31.781.9N1.549.8median 17.8median 63.2Delta2.8637.538.826.330.623.725.435.926.33637.324.923.820.423.218.525.716.931.217.946.31646.414.15312.259.513.357.810.967.912.366.712.168.212.571.911.872.511.972.612.471.212.871.313.1721373.113.275.313.675.413.670.813.765.81458.513.862.225840.659.3median 13.2median 67.91.59.3listening to varycover median Pink Noise {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_875715_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_875715_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_875715_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” model=”text-anchor:start;font-size:0.7em” x=”55″ y=”38″>Motorola Razr 2022 {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_875715_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” model=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”74.2″ x2=”90.2″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_855662_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_855662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_855662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” model=”text-anchor:start;font-size:0.7em” x=”313.4″ y=”38″>Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_855662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” model=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”332.6″ x2=”348.6″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″>

Frequency diagram (checkboxes may be checked and unchecked to match units)

Motorola Razr 2022 audio evaluation

(±) | speaker loudness is common however good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | practically no bass – on common 20% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is common (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – solely 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is common (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 okHz
(±) | larger highs – on common 6.8% larger than median
(±) | linearity of highs is common (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of total sound is common (18.7% distinction to median)
Compared to similar class
» 15% of all examined units on this class have been higher, 10% comparable, 76% worse
» The finest had a delta of 12%, common was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all units examined
» 42% of all examined units have been higher, 8% comparable, 50% worse
» The finest had a delta of three%, common was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 audio evaluation

(+) | audio system can play comparatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | practically no bass – on common 24.3% decrease than median
(±) | linearity of bass is common (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – solely 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 okHz
(+) | balanced highs – solely 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of total sound is common (17.6% distinction to median)
Compared to similar class
» 8% of all examined units on this class have been higher, 6% comparable, 85% worse
» The finest had a delta of 12%, common was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all units examined
» 35% of all examined units have been higher, 8% comparable, 58% worse
» The finest had a delta of three%, common was 20%, worst was 65%

Pros

+ very excessive efficiency

+ top quality workmanship

+ quick reminiscence

+ nice, versatile idea

Cons

mediocre audio system

sturdiness is unsure

robust heating

comparatively brief battery life

no wi-fi charging

In review: Motorola Razr 2022. Test system supplied by Motorola Germany.

The Motorola Razr 2022 is a big leap over the predecessor in lots of respects: significantly better construct high quality, far more energy, longer runtimes, an upgraded digital camera, and eventually additionally fashionable communication requirements. And all that’s accessible for significantly less cash.

The battery runtimes nonetheless can not sustain with inflexible excessive-finish telephones and also you additionally must dwell with vital warming.

The longevity of the folding mechanism and particularly the display screen stay a black field: though the expertise has already improved lots right here, nobody can assure whether or not the phone will nonetheless work flawlessly in a couple of years.

On the different hand, the fascination that the Razr exerts with its folding mechanism shouldn’t be underestimated. If you like one thing particular, you’ll get pleasure from the idea, which might be not excellent but however has been improved throughout.

The Motorola Razr 2022 has been improved significantly in comparison with its predecessor and is now a extremely good foldable smartphone at a good worth.

With all its upgrades, the foldable additionally turns into far more aggressive in opposition to the (manageable) competitors: the Galaxy Z Flip4 continues to be a bit cheaper, however doesn’t supply WiFi 6E and makes use of a slower USB port. The predecessor Razr 2019 is hardly accessible anymore, however it is just value shopping for at a really low worth, and if you’re okay with its restrictions.

At amazon.de or immediately from the producer you will get the Motorola Razr 2022 with 256 GB mass storage for the producer’s worth of slightly below 1,200 Euros. At cyberport.de you’ll be able to even save a couple of Euros at the time of testing and solely pay slightly below 1,150 Euros.

Motorola Razr 2022

01/11/2023 v7


Florian Schmitt

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Games Performance

61 / 64 → 95%

Application Performance

82 / 86 → 95%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

Florian Schmitt, 2023-01-12 (Update: 2023-01-12)

…. to be continued
Read the Original Article
Copyright for syndicated content material belongs to the linked Source : NotebookCheck – https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Razr-2022-review-Much-less-compromises-with-the-foldable-phone.681254.0.html

Exit mobile version