Claim IR35 reform repeal and U-turn cost the government ‘nothing’ called into question

The monetary secretary has come below fireplace for claiming that no extra prices had been incurred because of the government asserting a repeal of the IR35 reforms and then U-turning on that call 24 days later.

Victoria Atkins, who was appointed monetary secretary to the treasury in October 2022, made the declare in response to a written question posed by shadow monetary secretary James Murray on 9 January 2023.

Murray’s question noticed him ask the chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, to publish an estimate of the cost to the public purse, together with any cash spent on IT methods and assist employees, after the government introduced a repeal of the IR35 reforms in September 2022 earlier than U-turning on the resolution the following month.

In response, Atkins wrote: “The government did not incur any additional costs as a result of the announcement of the repeal and subsequent reinstatement of the off-payroll working rules.”

As beforehand reported by Computer Weekly, the repeal of the IR35 reforms was introduced on 23 September 2022 throughout Liz Truss’s premiership, which ran from 6 September 2022 to 25 October 2022, throughout the first and solely fiscal assertion made by short-lived chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng.

The repeal was one in all a number of bulletins made throughout Kwarteng’s controversial “mini-budget”, which triggered widespread financial turmoil and whose contents triggered the worth of the pound to drop to a historic low.

On 14 October 2022, it was confirmed that Kwarteng could be stepping down as chancellor, and three days later, his successor, Jeremy Hunt, confirmed the repeal would now not be going forward.

While the repeal itself was not as a consequence of come into impact till April 2023, Dave Chaplin, CEO and founding father of tax compliance agency IR35 Shield, mentioned it was “stretching credibility” to counsel that in the 24 days between the repeal and the U-turn being introduced that no prices had been incurred.

“Are we seriously expected to believe that every civil servant on government payroll did absolutely nothing [during this time]? From the business perspective, the market paused, and the advisory ships required an about-turn. That cost money. And then, we had to turn it back again. That cost money,” he mentioned.

“The repeal that by no means occurred was large information. There are nonetheless people and corporations who suppose the repeal remains to be occurring, who at the moment are working non-compliantly in consequence.

“It’s no wonder confusion still exists because we also know how much was spent on government communications. Zero. We know how much HMRC spent. Apparently zero. It’s not very responsible of government, is it?” he added.

Chaplin’s sentiments had been shared by tax and employment standing authorized guide Rebecca Seeley Harris, who beforehand served as a senior coverage advisor to the Office of Tax Simplification.

“I can understand why they are saying that there was no cost because they may not have taken any material action to implement the repeal. Not forgetting that the repeal would not have taken place until April 2023 in any case,” she instructed Computer Weekly.

“However, I doubt very much that there was no cost at all because I’m sure that HMRC would have been planning what they were going to do to replace the loss of IR35. This could have been to focus their attention on the Managed Service Company (MSC) legislation instead, for example. Even if this was man-hours, or should I say personnel time, there would have been a cost.”

Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 insurance coverage supplier Qdos, mentioned he additionally finds it “incredibly hard to believe” that the government incurred no extra prices because of its flip-flopping on the standing of the IR35 reforms, as a result of the wider economic system will surely have felt the results of that call.

“After the announcement, HMRC resource must have been allocated to planning for the repeal of the off-payroll working rules. This comes at a cost to taxpayers,” he instructed Computer Weekly.  

“We must also consider the indirect cost. A month of upheaval, disruption and uncertainty caused by news of the repeal and subsequent U-turn impacted the entire supply chain – from contractors themselves to recruitment agencies, umbrella companies and end-clients. The knock-on effect and, in turn, cost to the economy, would have been significant.”

Read extra on IT laws and regulation

• Top 10 IR35 tales of 2022

  

  By: Caroline Donnelly

• Top 50 ladies in UK tech, IR35 Truss fiasco – Computer Weekly Downtime Upload podcast

  

  By: Caroline Donnelly

• IR35 reforms repeal scrapped: Government labelled ‘spineless’ over u-turn

  

  By: Caroline Donnelly

• Government u-turns on plans to scrap IR35 reforms in public and personal sector from April 2023

  

  By: Caroline Donnelly