ChatGPT Used by Punjab and Haryana High Courts to Write Bail Order

Amidst the latest reputation of ChatGPT, a synthetic intelligence-driven chatbot, Indian excessive courts have discovered a use for it. On Monday, the Punjab & Haryana High Court used ChatGPT whereas deciding an order for a bail case.

It was primarily used to decide bail jurisprudence in a case the place an assailant’s assault is one that features cruelty. Justice Anoop Chitkara used the instrument to achieve a wider perspective on the matter.

ChaptGPT used to achieve broader image in authorized case

He put forth this query within the chat bar of ChatGPT:
“What is the jurisprudence on bail when the assailants assaulted with cruelty?

The AI tool promptly came up with this:

“The jurisprudence on bail for instances the place the assailants have assaulted with cruelty will rely upon the particular circumstances of the case and the legal guidelines and rules of the jurisdiction the place the case is being tried. However, basically, if the assailants have been charged with a violent crime that includes cruelty, equivalent to homicide, aggravated assault, or torture, they might be thought of a hazard to the group and a flight danger.

In such instances, the decide could also be much less inclined to grant bail or might set the bail quantity very excessive to be sure that the defendant seems in courtroom and doesn’t pose a danger to public security. The severity of the assault, the defendant’s felony historical past, and the energy of the proof in opposition to them are all components {that a} decide will contemplate when deciding whether or not to grant bail.

It is necessary to notice that the presumption of innocence is a elementary precept of the justice system, and all defendants are entitled to bail until there are compelling causes to deny it. Therefore, even in instances the place the assailants have assaulted with cruelty, they might nonetheless be granted bail if the decide determines that they don’t pose a danger to the group or a flight danger.”

However, the court clarified that the above use of the tool is not an expression of opinion on the merit of the case, and neither does the court side by it, but it was merely used to gain a broader perspective.

The judge in his order clarified:

“Any reference to ChatGPT and any statement made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the deserves of the case nor shall the trial Court advert to these feedback. This reference is just supposed to current a broader image on bail jurisprudence, the place cruelty is an element.”

ChatGPT used in attempt-to-murder court case

The Punjab and Haryana high court was hearing a bail petition in an attempt to murder case. The petitioner along with some of his accomplices had caused a brutal assault on an individual, which subsequently led to the individual’s death. The accused in this case also had a criminal history in two previous cases. The court observed that while death is cruel, cruelty that amounts to death needs to be seen in a different light altogether.

Justice Chitkara observed that, “When the offense is heinous and the crime is brutal, cruelty turns into one of many components in granting or refusing bail.” The courtroom subsequently dismissed the bail plea.

Best Mobiles in India